Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Demystifying the Dissertation

A Regular Writing Routine

October 16, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The concept of a regular writing routine is not unique to me — I just happen to love alliteration and so I repackaged the concept into a new term. Robert Boice (author of How Writer’s Journey to Comfort and Fluency) uses the term “brief, daily sessions,” Eviatar Zerubavel (author of The Clockwork Muse) adheres to the concept of being motivated by a “clockwork muse” rather than a “capricious muse.” Rick Reis (editor of Tomorrow’s Professor e-Newsletter) writes “Once you are ready to start doing this kind of writing, you need to commit to it on a regular, if limited, time per day basis. Forget about whether you feel motivated or not.” Feel free to struggle and compete with this concept; unfortunately, in the end you will lose. I can list thousands of authors who write on a regular basis, and swear by it. If you want to finish your dissertation in a timely manner and develop habits of fluent writing, you will have to succumb to establishing and sustaining a regular writing routine.

In this article, I’m starting a four-part series on developing a regular writing routine. In this column, I’ll discuss and debunk two popular myths about writing. In my next column, I’ll review two of my favorite articles, one on expert performance and the other on writing research and apply it to developing a regular writing routine. Then I’ll write a piece on what a regular writing routine looks like in real-time; that is, when you put your bum on the chair on your fingers on the keyboard, what really happens. To wrap up this series, I’ll present my new book, the whole of which is focused on getting you to develop a regular writing routine as you write your dissertation.

Myth #1: Writing can only occur in large blocks of time. I don’t know how many times I have heard this from students and know I have heard it too many times from new faculty members. From where I stand, there are two problems with waiting until you have a large block of time to write. The first is “How long?” Do you need four hours? Six hours? Ten hours? I’d had exchanges with my students that go like this:

Me: So, you need a large chunk of time to write? How long do you need?

Student: Five hours is usually the minimum time I need to get some really good writing done.

Me: OK. So can you write for five hours tomorrow?

Student: No, I only have four hours tomorrow.

Me: How about the day after?

Student: The day after? Let me see. Hum, I have four and a half hours the next day, not quite enough time.

Me: How about the day after that?

Student (who is smiling as she looks up after checking her calendar again): Nope.

And then we laugh as we decide that she’ll try and have a productive writing time within the measly four hours she has available for the next two days.

Very often when I present on developing a regular writing routine, I’ll have someone in the audience defend the practice and say that they can only write when they have large blocks of time and that it works for them. I don’t argue with these remarks. Although we inevitably end up talking about this issue after my presentation is over — they seek me out — and as we talk, they admit to me (really, they admit to themselves) that they are not as productive as they would like. And when they do start writing, they spend a good hour or so on warm-up time, remembering what they had written during the last writing session. If someone can only write in large blocks of time for writing and they have large blocks of time, all is well. Rarely have I found that doctoral students, post-docs, and new faculty members have this much time to write. I wish we all did, but the reality is that we don’t.

And let’s face it, the second problem with relying on large blocks of time to write is that waiting around until you have enough time is just another excuse not to write. If you write one hour a day, you have five hours of focused writing time by the end of the week; 20 hours by the end of the month; and 70 over the course of the semester. If you have two hours, that doubles to 140 hours over the course of the semester. As you are working on your dissertation, you have to put in as much productive writing time as you can. Often, you will be writing for an hour in between the courses you are teaching, while you are waiting for experiments to finish, or while your infant daughter is sleeping. Even if you have a lot of free time as a doctoral student or as a post-doc, chances are in an academic job or a professional job, you won’t have that luxury, so now is as good a time as ever to resurrect what may have been down time (checking Facebook??? Twitter???) and to use it productively. Of course check Facebook and Twitter, just after you have completed your writing.

I also want you to know that most professional writers spend up to four hours a day writing prose and the other part of the day doing research or useful stuff that keeps them healthy like taking walks and eating tofu. Four hours of focused, concentrated time, even across disciplines, seems to be the optimal length of time.

Myth #2: Writing can wait until motivation washes over you. I wish this were not a myth but instead that it was a universal truth. Imagine if we lived in a world where we were motivated to do all those things that are good for us. I need to write for three hours today and I feel inspired and motivated from the very first moment to the 180th minute! Today is my day to do 50 sit-ups after I finish 45 minutes on the treadmill, yahoo! I feel inspired to sort through the piles of papers in my spare room, and by golly, today just happens to be the day that I also planned to clear out the room! Mind you, I try to talk myself into being inspired to do the things I need to do, and sometimes it works. But sometimes, no matter what, doing 50 sit-ups doesn’t inspire or motivate me. Nor does writing for my two hours per day.

Instead of learning how to mix Felix Felicis (it’s liquid luck, a potion from Harry Potter that makes you lucky for a whole day), I wish I could mix a potion that makes me want to do the things that I have to do. Fortunately, there is a potion, at least for writing. Unfortunately, it is not as easy as bringing a flask to your lips and taking a long gulp. Motivation in writing comes from prewriting, prewriting, prewriting. Motivation occurs when you have done the necessary planning steps so that when you sit down to write prose, you have had time to subconsciously play around with the ideas and you only have to retrieve and type down the ideas, not to think them up. Motivation occurs when you have a very detailed long outline, filled in with citeable notes, by your desk that guides your writing. The citeable notes are short phrases (written in your own words) that remind you to insert the appropriate references into a particular section.

Even with all the necessary prewriting completed, there will be times when you just don’t feel like writing. As Rick Reis said in the quote I presented above: “Forget about whether you feel motivated or not.” When this happens, you’ll have to lean on pep talks from writing partners and the negative consequences of showing your blank writing graph to your writing group. Plus, you’ll have to have some tools in your toolbox ready for when perfectionism, procrastination, impatience, or depression/dysphoria threatens to disrupt a potentially productive writing session.

A regular writing routine is just as it sounds. It has to be regular for you to maximize the benefits. The benefits are minimal warm-up times, using that time walking from your car to your office to allow ideas to percolate, more chances to make connections among the other reading and research in which you are engaged (since the ideas are fresh in your mind), and investing more time in writing than if you relied on those large blocks of time to materialize or that motivation muse to flutter down from the heavens. If you are a full-time graduate student, I recommend that you start developing a regular writing routine that you engage in five to six days a week. If you are working full-time while pursuing your doctoral degree, I recommend that you plan on writing four days a week. Chances are your weekends are the time you get to invest in your dissertation writing; if so, I also recommend that you carve out at least 45-minutes on Tuesdays and Thursdays in order to keep your momentum going and to minimize your warm-up time for your weekend writing sessions.

Each session can start by being brief, as little as 20 minutes. While I know you won’t get a whole lot done in 20 minutes, these sessions are primarily meant to build habits of fluent writing rather than to churn out the pages. Then increase your 20 minute sessions by 20 minute sessions, until you are writing optimally for you, but please no longer than four hours of focused writing per day (prewriting, OK; revision, OK; writing, not so much). As I’ll present in my next column the research on expert performance and writing research supports that something happens when you engage in a regular writing routine — more than linearly building skills and investing time in writing. Along the way, you develop habits that allow you to see patterns in your writing, patterns where you focus on the meaning and the intent rather than on word recall and word order. The result is that your writing productivity and enjoyment catapult forward. Reaching this point is rewarding and it really does happen when you engage in a regular writing routine over a sustained time.

Please do not fall into the trap of compartmentalizing your writing, as I have seen far too many students do before they enter my class. I have known too many students who write their proposals and then stop writing while running experiments, interviewing participants, or analyzing texts. Then they switch back to writing full-time to complete the dissertation. For effectiveness and efficiency, I recommend that you spend at least some of your time writing while you are in the midst of your research and analysis. You will continue to work on your writing, your writing habits, and capture some of those insights that you have otherwise may have lost.

I am very sympathetic toanyone who believes that they need large blocks of time to write. I too wish that inspiration always aligned with whatever we needed to do. But I also want all of you to meet your goals and to complete a high quality dissertation in a timely manner. So, I hope you will consider letting go of any unhelpful writing myths that you hold dear, if you do hold any dear, and experiment with new techniques for increasing your writing fluency and comfort.

There is much more to write on developing a regular writing routine. As I mentioned above, in my next column I’ll spend time reviewing research on expert performance and writing research that applies directly to developing and sustaining a regular writing routine. As always, if you have questions, comments, or suggestions for future articles, please contact me.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A Regular Writing Routine

  • evidence please
  • Posted by here we go again........ on October 16, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • I am SO sick of hearing this kind of data presented as "fact" -- the writer claims to explode myths, but presents NO data to back up her claims. Please show evidence-based studies about writing this way. Another 'for hire' website to help people write which I shall not mention makes the same claims -- but when I asked for citations to studies -- had none to give me. Sure, some authors write regularly -- and write about writing regularly. Because they have written that, does not make it scientific data.

    And I dare anyone to teach 400 students, grade their writing every week, have 30 online hours a week of discussions and office hours, 10 hours required in our office each week for office hours, 8 committees, many that meet each week for 1-2 hours, be an editor of a journal, be active (required at our school) in at least two community agencies (usually 10 or more hours a month), have even a bit of a private life, and write every day. Those I know who do -- have GAs to do the grading, don't hold office hours, use scantron tests (we are forbidden to do that), have wives/husbands who let them hole up and write, and so forth. I have none of those. And know what -- I have over 50 publications as a 'spree' writer, and I am happy with my amount of publications.

    I know -- one person does not equal data. So true -- but neither do "lots of writers...." equal scientific data that this is the best way to write!!!!!!!!!!!!! Show me the data. Again, even a few 'satisfied customers' does not make data.

  • Posted by Eveningsun on October 16, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • <I>...teach 400 students, grade their writing every week, have 30 online hours a week of discussions and office hours, 10 hours required in our office each week for office hours, 8 committees, many that meet each week for 1-2 hours, be an editor of a journal, be active (required at our school) in at least two community agencies (usually 10 or more hours a month)....</I>

    Why would anyone live like that? Better to get another job. No one <I>has</I> to teach, y'know.

  • Posted on October 16, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • I suggest reading Wendy Belcher's Writing your Journal Article in 12 Weeks. She breaks it down into very digestible (and very doable) blocks of time. It relies on others' experiences, many who are just as busy and overwhelmed by their daily lives, too. You never know, it might just work for you!

  • evidence
  • Posted on October 16, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • In regards to evidence, this is not a peer-reviewed journal but an online newsletter. If you doubt the validity of the claims made by research discussed in the piece, do a literature search yourself and look for data-oriented studies. They're out there. Or better yet, do a self study and see how much writing you get done via both modes. Because in the end, even if theses studies are well-designed with excellent samples, data collection and analyses, they can only conclude that some people can be more producitve using this technique. So if you want "proof" that it does or does not work for you, you're going to have to try it yourself. Moreover, if evidence is so important, your "spree" writing may have produced 50 articles, but where's your data demonstrating that consistent writing didn't produce more?

  • Progress, albeit not "evidence-based"
  • Posted , Director on October 16, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • As with many things, good scientific data are not available to evaluate the author's suggestions. And despite some of the claims of some proponents of "evidence-based" studies, one size never fits all. However, we have had dissertation groups for several years and we find that establishing a regular writing routine, and developing fluency and momentum, frequently are effective ways to help students who are stuck, confused, disorganized, terrified, or otherwise overwhelmed make progress on the dissertation. Thanks for the article. We will distribute it to our groups.

  • Show me the data?
  • Posted by Riall Nolan , Professor of Anthropology at Purdue University on October 16, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • I'm a little unsure as to what "here we go again" would accept as data. The writer of the article was making two simple points: you can write with less time available than you think, and you don't need to wait for the muse.

    Data? Ask any of the hundreds of writers (myself included) who have written successfully that way. I say "hundreds" but I'm sure it's hundreds of thousands -- the "hundreds" are the folks who've told other people, in print, about how they do it.

    Everyone writes differently, and what we need to do to encourage people to write is to point out to them that almost everyone -- including someone with a load as daunting as "here we go again" -- can indeed manage to write. Most successful writers write because they feel internally driven to do it, not because they feel they have to to satisfy a tenure committee or whatever. And because of this, they find ways to write under extraordinary circumstances.

    We don't need "data" to tell us that -- it's all around us, in the personal stories of the writers themselves.

  • Regular writing is absolutely key
  • Posted by EG on October 16, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • This article really resonated with me, because I didn't come to realize these myths until after college. I would have avoided a lot of stress if I had established a writing routine and wasn't just waiting for bouts of inspiration (though they did sometimes come, and were usually great).

    I've found that having a blog (whether available to the whole internet, or gated to a few friends) is an excellent way to work your writing muscle and stick to a writing routine in a nonthreatening environment. Writing for fun can keep your writing just as sharp as writing for an assignment or a job.

  • Data? Please!
  • Posted by Sherbygirl on October 16, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • This is advice, not policy or law. Personally, I write better when I do have lots of time and I always wait until inspiration hits. I'm a bit manic that way; I'll do what I call word-vomit for three days, but then write nothing for weeks. It worked for me. Could this have worked better? Who knows. But I also know that my way of writing can't work for everyone, and it's always good to have other methods to recommend/try.

    Have we gotten so far gone that unless we have stats to back it up, we won't do it? That's the problem with education (esp. at the K-12 level): common sense takes a back seat to "evidence." If students really are all unique little snowflakes, what difference does it make if it helps 97% of students? Those other three percent still need to learn/write/be educated. Good grief! As a teacher, I want as many tools in my bag of tricks in order to be able to help as many students as I can.

  • I'm the data you seek!
  • Posted by Bradley Bleck , English Instructor at Spokane Falls CC on October 16, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Okay, maybe not, but I write in the way described because I am unable to sit still for three, four, or five hours. Maybe even two. Maybe. I tell my students it will likely be productive for them if they chip away at their task, especially if they won't wait until the last minute. For most student writers, putting off the work until the time is "optimum" based on whatever conditions is just avoiding what needs doing. In that regard, the essay is "busting" the myth of needing large chunks of time. Next up: I do my best writing under pressure.

  • Posted by DoveArrow on October 16, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • I have to say I agree with the author's point that you don't need large blocks of time to write. A lot of times I write on my lunch hour, and while I might only get through two or three paragraphs written in those sixty minutes, that's two or three more paragraphs then I would have written if I hadn't sat down and started typing away. That may not seem like much, but two or three paragraphs a day soon turns into several pages, which then turn into whole chapters.

    Admittedly, it's slow going, and I do prefer those moments when I can sit down and get three or four hours of writing done in one go. However, when you work eight hours a day, have a family, and drive an hour and a half to and from work every day, finding three or four hours of free time is incredibly hard. It's much easier to find a free forty five minutes to an hour, and just sit down and do some writing.

  • Posted by cacambo on October 16, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Ummm.... doesn't the column end with the promise that "in my next column I’ll spend time reviewing research on expert performance and writing research that applies directly to developing and sustaining a regular writing routine"?

  • It's only time
  • Posted by Idealist on October 16, 2009 at 1:00pm EDT
  • Some readers obviously had great expectations of this article. Is it that our analytical minds are so focused on the need for absolute proof that we can’t recognize a motivational piece when we see it? Myths are beliefs without a basis in fact. We all know that. The message here is “Believing” in false walls often prevents writers from flexing their respective muscles. The article has a simple point… If you wait to write for all the wrong reasons you may never get started. Just do it, in bits and pieces if you must. Find the method and style that works for you. I don’t see need for data to back this premise. Dare I say it… Just common sense!

    We all have demanding work schedules and often are over the top in duties. If writing, re-writing, editing and proof reading must be accomplished piecemeal, then so be it. The real tragedy is never finding the time to embrace the pen.

  • Posted by volprof on October 16, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • I run our department's dissertation seminar, and encourage my students to "write" every day if the can, and if not to schedule specific time during the week. Why the scare quotes? Well, I think anything that adds to a particular project counts for writing time, depending on the stage of that project.

    To the first comment, you are right to note your busy schedule. But this makes it all the more important to schedule regular writing time. I imagine that for the vast majority of those obligations, you schedule your commitments. Why not do this with writing as well. Schedule some time during your week, and make it inviolable. We do that with our teaching, why not with writing as well? Even if its not every day, any time on sets aside and commits to will prove to be more productive than hoping it happens at some point in the midst of a crazy schedule.

  • Posted by ml on October 17, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • I completely understand the annoyance of people. I found this advice very annoying when I first heard it from an academic coach Gina Hiatt (google academic ladder). This is exactly her line on writing. She has looked at the data and these are her conclusions and she has studied the issue very carefully. So the ideas in the article may be common wisdom among those who look at productivity and writing.

    The method of writing at a set time every day for a limited amount of time, no matter what the level of inspiration, has worked for scores of fiction writers--Anthony Trollope, e.g.. (But who can be Anthony Trollope?)

    Gina the academic coach stressed the short block method constantly and I tried it and tried it and it did not work for me (but see below). I too must have long blocks of time. Working with a coach, I did come to understand why this is true of me and the coach was flexible enough to help me carve out a more individualized strategy.

    I agree with the person above who said that people are different and write differently but that you don't know this is true of you until you try this other method. The data supports this method works for many people. So it would be rational to try it.

    Also, to the person with the crazy teaching job--I would say that this is actually designed for those teaching schedules because you can use any tiny increment of time. If there is any possibility of writing when you have an overwhelming number of things to do, this is the best option. I realize it might not be possible but it may also be that it takes an extremely long time to finish an article. The method described above at least gives a person with 400 students a fighting chance.

    An interesting this is that I have a kid and a very demanding teaching load and I found very long blocks of time at different points. They exist in your life but it also requires that everything else fall by the wayside. It wasn't good for my family because essentially those times were all leisure or free times.

    I wish I were able to do what the author of this piece recommends. Almost every highly productive person I know is like this about their work. There is substantial data on it that the author has not cited. I now believe that perhaps the attempt to work in short increments--combined with the finding of large blocks of writing time that I created by neglecting everything in my life and letting absolutely everything go to hell--was key. I did eventually get a lot done in a short time by the half hour, etc., writing when I was not inspired and what Gina the academic coach calls 'binge writing.' Beyond a doubt, the half hour, little chunks thing did nothing for me on its own and it would have been terrible folly for me to keep at that.

    I am a believer in this method even if some may have to modify it considerably to make it work. It seems condescending and unbelievable but this is ultimately sound advice about writing.

  • Eveningsun
  • Posted by DFS on October 17, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Why did your HTML come out looking like it did in your comment?

    Were you operating from a different software platform?

  • And, how about Truth #0:
  • Posted by DFS on October 17, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Writing comes about only after thought. Note: Thought is a continuous process. There is no timeline, other than the deadline.

    You have the 'chops,' or you don't.

  • Rather, Myth #0
  • Posted by Another Writer on October 17, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • DFS posts another myth worth responding to: "Writing comes about only after thought."
    Research (see a concise and measured recent review in C. Bazerman, Genre and Cognitive Development: Beyond Writing to Learn [2009]) demonstrates that writing can generate thought. It's not only the one-way street that DFS suggests, the one that begins with thought-chops and leads to writing. Thus another benefit of writing early, writing regularly, and/or writing at many stages of the research/study process is the likelihood that more and better thinking will occur.
    Writers do not need to wait until they know what exactly they want to write, having worked out all the tricky thought problems. The act of writing itself can provoke a higher level of thinking. In that case, chops is as chops does.

  • You still have to think, though, Another Writer.
  • Posted by DFS on October 19, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • It's just another one of those annoying details.

    Let's please just don't try to program everything into A yields B yields C . . .

  • What about Research Time?
  • Posted by Wilfred P. Most on October 19, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • Upon my admittedly quick scan, no one here appears to mention research time, or the awkwardness of carrying large bags of library books, copies of articles, etc. around with one--stuff one might need to have alongside the laptop as one attempts to write on a bus, train, or subway.

    Please advise,
    WPM

  • BTW, Another Writer, You're Right.
  • Posted by DFS on October 19, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • I was too quick and lazy to thoroughly explain myself.

    I'm just rejecting any codified process. Sometimes it just comes out more or less only needing a tweak or two.

    Early writing has been useful to me as well. The earlier you present some conversation to yourself on paper or screen, the more often you get to argue with it. This is a good thing.

    I'm simply resisting any formula. Sometimes your first instinct in the correct instinct.

    Note: I put these thoughts down yesterday, then attenuated them. Another day or several, and I would be even better!