BlogU

  • 5 Reasons Microsoft Will Buy Blackboard

    By Joshua Kim September 7, 2009 9:08 pm EDT

    The top 5 reasons why we will see Microsoft buying Blackboard by the end of 2010:

    1. The education market will continue to grow and is an important sector for a technology and platform company to have a presence. The CMS is increasingly at the heart of the campus educational experiences and is integrated with other campus services. The opportunity to offer schools a vertical and integrated solution (from server OS, to communication/collaboration, to storage and the CMS) will be attractive to many institutions. A good business case can be made that Blackboard will provide reliable earnings into the future due to ongoing subscriptions from the large customer base, with opportunities to leverage the existing sales force for new customers while up-selling to other services and platforms. Microsoft has the scale in marketing and sales to grow the CMS business internationally.

    2. Buying Blackboard will instantly address the problem of Microsoft losing relevance in higher education. Google's Apps for Education program is rapidly gaining traction, crowding out the traditional Exchange based contracts. Students and faculty increasingly prefer Apple products and the Apple OS for high-end machines, with Linux and the Google Chrome OS posing a significant threat for low-end computers. Purchasing Blackboard will immediately make Microsoft relevant on campus, particularly if the purchase allows services to increase and costs to be driven down due to the scale and existing products that Microsoft can bring to the business.

    3. The CMS market will evolve towards the cloud. Multi-tenancy (many customers running on one instance) allows cloud applications to scale, radically reducing per unit cost by distributing inputs such as power, cooling, backup, maintenance etc. over many users. Educational institutions that have existing local Blackboard instances will strain to meet the financial and people resource demands as complexity increases. Growth in the CMS market will largely need to be in the cloud, as both secondary schools and international educational providers will not be able to afford to local run and maintain the CMS. Microsoft will be able to leverage the enormous investments the company has made in its cloud infrastructure to both increase the capabilities of the CMS and drive down costs per institution.

    4. Microsoft could improve the Blackboard experience by bundling in cloud based services such as personal storage, robust presence awareness and collaboration, and integrated calendaring, messaging and e-mail. Web-based productivity tools (Office Live - documents, presentations, spreadsheets) could also be integrated into Blackboard for more powerful authoring and sharing of content. Bundling all these services seamlessly into Blackboard would erode the momentum that Google has been gaining on campus with Google Docs. Integrating Microsoft's search technology into Blackboard (search is terrible in Blackboard) would be great way for Microsoft to leverage this technology within a vertical market. Allowing students and faculty to tag content that is open, and then having a universe of open content from Blackboard to search for and display in Blackboard (or even from Bing) would represent an advance over Google in search.

    5. Education is an important core value for the Microsoft culture. Extending Blackboard to schools and universities throughout the world with locally appropriate pricing (made possible by Microsoft's data center scale) will contribute to and extend Microsoft's mission of empowering people through technology. Bill Gates' effort to offer great lectures to the world through the Web with project Tuva can be integrated and expanded into a Microsoft owned Blackboard business. Think of the depth of educational content that Microsoft could capture, share, and distribute in conjunction with a cloud based Blackboard sitting on a universal database of learning materials. For years Microsoft has had a presence in offering learning content, an effort that never gained any traction in higher education. Using Blackboard to both aggregate and distribute learning content on a worldwide basis would build on efforts such as MIT's Open CourseWare, and be a counter to efforts by Apple and Google in this space.

    I wonder if anyone from Microsoft is going to read this post? Microsoft needs to find a way to join a larger conversation in higher education beyond their installed SharePoint / Exchange base. The truth is that Microsoft simply has not felt very relevant to innovations in learning technology for the past few years. One signal that they care about this space would be to find ways to engage our community in debate and discussion.

    What do you think? Is Blackboard too small a company to take advantage of the opportunities they have created by rolling up the for-profit CMS space? Is Blackboard an outlier in a world of consolidation within the technology industry? Is Microsoft the right company to purchase Blackboard? Would this be a good or bad thing for higher education? What do you think the odds are that I'm correct that we will see a Microsoft purchase of Blackboard by the end of 2010?

Advertisement

Comments on 5 Reasons Microsoft Will Buy Blackboard

  • Who buys a vendor with a shrinking market share?
  • Posted by Ben , IT Manager on September 8, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • 5 years ago I would have agreed with you, but don't forget Microsoft used to own a significant portion of Blackboard inc but chose not to buy it. I don't have the figures but everywhere I look Web CT/Blackboard clients are moving to Moodle or Sakai. Blackboard's policy of madly buying up competitors is starting to catch up with it as it now struggles to support multiple LMSs to the point that it's not keeping up with the depth of innovation of its open source competitors.
    Did you know that Microsoft offers Moodle integration in its live@edu product (http://www.educationlabs.com/projects/moodleproduct/Pages/default.aspx) as far as I'm aware there's no such integration with Blackboard.

  • Posted by Nick on September 8, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • Smaller customers may be moving away, but many larger customers can't afford to.

    We looked into Moodle and Saki and found that they would cost more money to impliment, and weren't designed around enterprise requirements. As for features, when we looked at the various systems, only the commercial products could offer what we needed. That may change, but for now Blackboard still has control.

    As for the Live@EDU integration, it does exist for Blackboard, just not from MS directly. several schools have worked on this already.

  • Blackboard, too visionary for Microsoft
  • Posted by Alex on September 8, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Blackboard is not a good fit for Microsoft and vice versa. Blackboard is entirely java-based, Unix-based, a very dynamic company full of innovation and pedagogical impetus. Blackboard has partnerships with Google; Blackboard supports open standards; Blackboard is iPhone-friendly, they just bought that Mobile Edu Stanford spin-off.

    Blackboard is all over the map and has plenty of ambitious plans of its own.

    As for the alleged Moodle and Sakai exodus, it is grossly exagerated. Nobody is moving to Sakai because it is too complicated and too expensive to run, and only some small colleges are moving to Moodle.

    As for Blackboard, they just turned the corner with a brand new hip and still very easy to use Next Generation system -- their new Web 2.0 platform, easily adaptable and interoperable with all sort of technology. Why should they lock themselves to Microsoft, Apple, Oracle or any one company or technology?

  • 5 Reasons Facebook will Buy BlackBoard
  • Posted by Steve Cooper , Founder at Tech University of America on September 8, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • 1) Facebook's growth in terms of adding new users on a daily basis is outpacing Microsoft

    2) Users prefer Facebook to Microsoft products in terms of usability

    3) Facebook is better positioned to monetize the learning experience than Microsoft

    4) Facebook uses open APIs so end-user innovation is more likely to occur within Facebook than Microsoft products.

    5) Facebook is FREE!

  • "Should," not "Will"
  • Posted by Larry MacPhee , e-Learning at Northern Arizona University on September 8, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • If you re-title your article "Why Microsoft Should Buy Blackboard" I think your arguments stand. However, there is no evidence that Microsoft *will* buy Blackboard. Apple, with billions in cash, could just as easily buy Blackboard and it might be an even better fit. But there's NO evidence that any of these events WILL happen.

  • Posted by Ed on September 8, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • Like the previous poster, there seems to be absolutely no evidence of Blackboard being bought by anyone, in the foreseeable future.

    First of all, unlike Angel Learning and WebCT, Blackboard is not having any financial problems of any kind. Blackboard appears to be a strong multi-billion dollar company, going about its business of making its comprehensive products and services more appealing to colleges, universities and K-12 institutions.

    Besides, acquiring a complex mission-critical enterprise higher education product line, like Blackboard's, is no small feat, akin of purchasing some small piece of software, like the Writely word processor and sticking it in Google Apps, Facebook or anywhere else, as an after-thought add-on feature.

    Look elsewhere for companies like Microsoft, Apple and Google to make increased discrete inroads in the education market.

  • Responding to Comments - "Should not Will"
  • Posted by Joshua Kim , Senior Learning Technologist / Adjunct Professor Sociology at Dartmouth College on September 8, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • Larry and Ed...thanks for posting. You are both 100% correct that there is no evidence that my thought experiment will play out. My intention is more to push on Microsoft then to lay bets on the future. So definitely this is a "should" - and I'll make the case (and will make the case in this space) that Blackboard is a good acquisition target for Google, Oracle, and maybe some others. Still....I think it would be a smart move for Microsoft....an argument that I'd love to be able to make face-to-face to Ballmer.

  • They Shouldn't and They Won't
  • Posted by Barry Dahl , V.P. Technology at Lake Superior College on September 9, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • The top 5 reasons why we WON'T see Microsoft buying Blackboard by the end of 2010:

    • 1. Because they suck! (they = Bb of course)
    • 2. Because Microsoft is trying harder not to suck so much.
    • 3. Because buying Blackboard would only prove that Microsoft is more evil rather than less.
    • 4. Because most of the people in the education space (including lots of Blackboard users) think that Blackborg is a terrible partner for education. Not exactly the best way for Microsoft to become more relevant in the education sector.
    • 5. Because they suck!

    Please let me know if I've missed anything.

    A few other comments on this have been posted on my blog. http://desire2blog.blogspot.com/2009/09/5-reasons-microsoft-wont-buy-blackboard.html

  • Will they ... ?
  • Posted by David Hopkins on September 9, 2009 at 3:15pm EDT
  • If only to remove the compettion - MS are pushing Silverlight and SharePoint, and BB (et al) are spoiling their fun, so far. There is nothing technical that MS could gain from buying BB, but the coverage and client base could a nice incentive.

    Mind you, with the number of Institutions dumping BB in favour of Moodle and other easier, cheaper alternatives there won't be much to buy soon ... ??

    David

  • Doubt it
  • Posted by Ryan on September 11, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Both BB Academic Suite and ANGEL do run on Windows. The Windows version of "blackboard classic" is certainly not as frequently installed on Windows. A testimate to that stability is the fact that Blackboard's Managed Hosting group is 100% Oracle/Linux. ANGEL is all MS/SQL so depending on how the inevitable integration/joning of those two products goes it could turn more Windows-y but I doubt it. Also there would be the question of what to do with Blackboard's other business units... the Transact/Card System business, bbConnect mass messaging (which IS also Windows based) and Xythos. Interesting thoughts tho.

  • Posted by Koneru on December 7, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • Bb uses Oracle and Java so I don't think Micrsoft would be least intrested unless otherwise they want to migrate it to Mysql :)